All posts tagged: facebook

Franklin Foer: ‘Big tech has been rattled. The conversation has changed’

When the author Franklin Foer initially raised issues about Silicon Valleys power gamers, individuals took a look at me amusing. Now his work appears prophetic

The admission by Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg was disconcerting.

“Things occurred on our platform in this election that ought to not have actually occurred,” she stated in an onstage interview recently with Mike Allen, the reporter and Washington diary-keeper. “Especially, and really unpleasant, foreign disturbance in a democratic election.”

But Sandberg averted a string of follow-up concerns. What “things”? When precisely did Facebook see the “things”? Was it a great deal of “things”? Has the business looked after the issue? And why should the general public take Facebook’s word for it?

The Sandberg interview became part of a very first wave of troubleshooting by Facebook in a crisis that is simply starting to substance. Executives from Facebook, Google and Twitter have actually been contacted us to provide sworn public statement prior to a United States congressional panel early next month about exactly what occurred on their platforms in the run-up to the governmental election, now practically a year earlier. The business have actually likewise been approached by Robert Mueller, the unique counsel examining supposed ties in between Russia and the Donald Trump governmental project.

For all the consequences of Trump’s presidency, amongst the most unexpected might be the hostile analysis that has actually emerged of America’s star-dusted tech business, as awareness dawns of how Russia made the most of the business’ platforms– and their extremely successful fascinations with targeting people and content sharing, minus oversight– to raise Trump and attack Hillary Clinton.

“They’re being rattled in such a way where they’ve never ever been rattled,” stated Franklin Foer, whose brand-new book, World Without Mind: the Existential Threat of Big Tech , can be checked out as an exceptional prediction of huge tech’s public numeration. Speaking on the phone from Washington DC, Foer stated it would be an error to believe the federal government was striking the business yet “with its heaviest blows”.

“It’s simply to state that they’ve simply been so unharmed for so long, that even these reasonably harmless calls to turn over proof or to affirm are culturally and politically considerable.”

Foer’s book outgrew a cover story about monopolistic abuses by Amazon in The New Republic, the intellectually recognized, century-old publication of public affairs at which Foer took 2 turns as editor. At the time, Foer was wanting to transform the publication for the Facebook age after it was purchased by a co-founder of Facebook. His individual informing of that story in World Without Mind remembers a previous book where he utilized his nuclear-grade soccer fandom to describe globalization.

“I began dealing with this in 2014, when I did, individuals took a look at me amusing,” Foer stated of the brand-new book. “It resembled I was a hippy wailing into the wind, it seemed like, due to the fact that of the eminence that these tech business held. Unexpectedly, when the book came out last month, I had a radio host implicating me of spouting the traditional knowledge. The tide had actually turned so rapidly.

“The greatest issue is that Facebook and Google are these huge feedback loops that provide individuals exactly what they wish to hear. When you utilize them in a world where your predispositions are being continuously validated, you end up being vulnerable to phony news, propaganda, demagoguery.”

Official and public outrage is growing at the tech business with the awareness that an army of Russia-linked bots and giants running as imposter accounts on Facebook, Twitter and other networks had the ability to purchase advertisements and target an approximated numerous millions of Americans with political messages throughout the election. The strategies of the imposter accounts, which looked for to irritate users over hot-button social concerns, have actually highlighted a sneaking sense of the nation having actually been practically gotten into– and outmaneuvered.

 google /> Photograph: JasonDoiy/Getty Images

The present examination is all the complete stranger considered that huge tech has actually gotten a virtual totally free pass in its present version. For the last 15 years, legislators have actually shrugged as Amazon bulldozed its method to a near- monopoly in the book organisation and most each retail organisation. And nobody took much interest as Facebook controlled users’ news feeds, inflated its metrics to marketers and explore owning citizen turnout. Couple of appeared to care as Google scanned libraries loaded with copyrighted product and, like Apple, moved billions in properties offshore to reduce tax liabilities. These business continued to grow and squeeze almost every rival out.

The bigger concerns of possible risks presented by huge tech, on the other hand– as the business gather unlimited information about United States people to whom they constantly offer gadgets and items developed to make our lives constantly easier– have actually shown entirely outside the federal government’s ken.

Like no other occasion prior to it, Foer stated, the election of Trump has actually taken shape the sensation that the huge tech business– Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft — have actually maybe been permitted to collect a little excessive power with somewhat insufficient oversight.

“The election is the important things that’s altered the discussion,” he stated. “For liberals, a great deal of it pertains to this mad sense that Facebook was in some way complicit in the Trump success. For conservatives, it’s their rote hatred of huge media, in the sense that gatekeepers who are liberal will constantly rig the system in favor of liberals. In the end, it’s a shared stress and anxiety.

“There are plainly emancipatory powers prowling within these brand-new innovations. When that power ends up being caught, and when uniqueness and our sense of company ends up being illusory– when power ends up being so deeply focused in a little handful of companies on which we all depend, then we are skewing in the instructions of dystopia.”

When Foer started dealing with his book, he was nearing completion of an extremely individual lesson about how huge tech might cannot measure up to its own high-minded objectives. 2 years previously, the Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes had actually dedicated a sliver of his fortune to purchasing The New Republic and persuaded Foer to take a 2nd turn as editor-in-chief.

Hughes, Foer composes, was “a legendary hero– boyishly innocent, remarkably abundant, intellectually curious, suddenly simple, and happily optimistic”. The publication developed a brand-new website without an identifiable advertisement existence and avoided seo and other uninspiring tools that contemporary media business utilize in the mission for clicks and the advertisement cash behind them.

The experiment ended after Foer released the Amazon cover story and Hughes, having actually recognized just how much cash he was losing, employed a CEO from Yahoo! who rebranded the publication as a “vertically incorporated digital media business”. A personnel exodus took place, with Foer in front.

“I hope this book does not encounter as sustained by anger, however I do not wish to reject my anger either,” Foer composes. In World Without Mind, his review of Amazon has actually progressed into a sophisticated polemic versus the huge business whose capability to please customers has for too long masked corollary threats for the economy, for individual privacy and, eventually, for the workout of democracy.

“It’s not that we have to toss our iPhones into the sea, or that we have to position the concept of an online search engine into an archive where just scholars with white gloves would have the ability to take a look at it,” Foer stated. “We must have the ability to form these innovations in a manner that they do not disrupt the functions of our democracy, they do not addict us, they do not control us.”

Foer welcomes the concern of exactly what type of guideline might remain in order– an old-fashioned monopoly-bust? A federal information security law?– by indicating London’s choice to de-license Uber, and to the effort in Europe to tame Google.

“I’m actually doubtful of the concept that there can be some regulative body that can manage Facebook and require it to act in a virtuous sort of method,” he stated.

“The Europeans are sort of searching towards the dismemberment of Google today, by attempting to sever the advertisement company from its search service. I believe that there’s some comparable sort of design that might be used to Facebook that would have the result of seriously injuring its monopoly and would have the result of making it act more virtuously.”

Foer likewise indicates an effort introduced this summertime by a union of significant paper and brand-new media business to obtain approval from Congress to haggle jointly with Facebook and Google over advertisement income and access to material. Even as they count on the tech giants to discover a broad readership, media business have actually been starved of advertisement income, and pressed in some cases to termination, by the very same business.

“That the media alliance is promoting regulative options is intriguing,” stated Foer. “That it’s not simply silently groaning about Google and Facebook, that they’re now actively pressing back. And I believe it’s shown in the protection.

“It’s relatively spectacular to take a look at the paper every day and to awaken to exactly what appears like a fresh mainstream media attack on huge tech, which is something I actually had not anticipated. New media had actually sort of laid prostrate prior to these men, and generally accepted their fate as type of being connected to Facebook and Google.

“It’s like a post-Soviet state having a color transformation to enjoy media rebel versus these business.”

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us

Marissa SafontFranklin Foer: ‘Big tech has been rattled. The conversation has changed’
read more

Stopping the spread of fake news isnt Facebooks jobits yours

In the fight against fake news, it’s not up to internet giants like Facebookto ensure what you’re reading is trustworthy and accurate. It’s up to you.

Whether you’re searching Google or browsing your social mediafeeds, you cannot simply take a headline at face value. Websites are clamoring to make money off of your eyeballs, trying to game the system for clicks and pageviewsand some sites are willing to do this by any means possible, with no regard for social consequences.This is something the American public is having a difficult time understanding, and something tech companies are desperatelytrying to remedy.

Facebook, largely blamed for the “fake news” issuepopularized after the 2016 election cycle, has implemented a number of tools and algorithms to stop misleading articles from cropping up in your feed. It’smade iteasier for users to flag fake news themselves,and it began using third-party fact checkers to verify flagged stories. Most recently, Facebookhas also tackled ways to keep misleading news sites from making money on the platform and offered tips for how to spot fake news.

“False news is harmful to our community, it makes the world less informed, and it erodes trust,” Facebook’s VP of News Feed Adam Mosseri wrote in a recent blog post.

Google is also battling this issue. The search giant has similarlybegun usingthird-party fact checkersfor articles that crop up in Google News and Search results. Soon, when you Google a popular stat, you willquickly learn whether it’s real or false. Hopefully, this will help stop folks from perpetuating out-of-date or completely made-up facts.

The real problem

What Google and Facebook are doing is merely a Band-Aid for a bigger problem, though. We aren’t using our critical thinking skills as we browse the Internet. We see a headline that enrages us and click “Share” without a second thought. We read an article that confirms our long-held beliefs and treat it as fact, without examining the source of that information.

The problem extends beyond just news articles, too. A friend, looking for a new iPad case recently, couldn’t remember what model iPad she owned. She Googled her tablet’s model number, saw it was an original iPad, and shared the case she was planning to buy. Something didn’t feel quite right, so I asked her to relay the model number information to me, and I searched as well. My search revealed that she did not have a first-generation iPad, but rather a fourth-gen model.

You see, the top search results for thatquery were from a seller who’d SEO’d the shit out of itsproducts. “First generation iPad” featured prominently in the SEO title, so she assumed that’s what she owned. Below that result was a link to Apple’s website detailing the model numbers for its iPad linewhere I learned the truth.

In today’s digital world, you cannot search for something and trust the first result that crops up.Luckily, there’s a very quick way to fix this problem.

What we need to do

To avoid fake news and internet scams, there needs to be a fundamental change in the way we think about getting information online. We need to teach our fathers, grandmothers, children, and friends to use critical thinking skills before trusting what theyread. At the very least, we really need to beat into people’s heads that the results that show up at the top of Google are often advertisementsand often misleading.

Beyond that, there are a few quick, easy questions you can ask yourselfbefore trusting anything you see on social media or in search.

1) Who’s the source of the information?

If it’s one of these 25 legitimate-sounding websites, it’s likely false. Move along. If it’s a website you’ve never heard of, try to find ifsimilar information is also printednot just by other sitesbut by reputable placeslike the New York Times orscientific journals. If you can’t find additional support, don’t trust it.

2) Does it sound too good to be true?

Ah, the hallmark of the hoax. Whenit sounds too good to be true, it probably (almost definitely) is.

3) How old is it?

The internet is constantly circulating and re-circulating stories. Check the date something was published; you may be surprised to learn it’s actually several years old and being taken (in today’s world) completely out of context. If a story is published without a date, that’s also a sign you should question itsveracity.

If you want to be seriously thorough, FactCheck.org has a handful of other ways to check if a story is real or not. However, I find with thethree questions above, I can quickly and accurately ascertain whethersomething sounds legitimate within a matter of seconds. (Then, of course, you’ve got to take the next step: reading thecontent and judging whether it lives up to your firstimpression.)

You can point fingers at Internet giants. You can say they need to improve their algorithms so we can lazily search without engaging a brain cell. But with the vast amount of information produced each day (2.5 exabytes worth, according to Northwestern University), it’s becoming an increasingly complicated algorithmic mountain to climb. On top of that, let’s be real: You shouldn’t be trusting a company that makes money off of your browsing to tell you what is and isn’t fact. That’s kind of like trusting pharmaceutical companies to tell you what illnesses you do and don’t need to treat.

Unless the structure of the Internet fundamentally changes, discerning what’s “real” and what’s “fake,” what’s “legitimate” and what’s a “scam,” will continue tofall on users. And those of us whoare enlightened about how this gamereally works need to help educate those whoare stuck in the Ask Jeeves era.

Read more: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/avoid-fake-news-google-effectively/

Marissa SafontStopping the spread of fake news isnt Facebooks jobits yours
read more